The right to keep and bear arms is a civil right. It always was.
The Second Amendment does not create this right. It acknowledges one that existed before the Constitution was written, before the country was founded, and before any government had the authority to recognize or deny it.
A person's right to defend their life, their family, and their freedom is not a political position. It is the most fundamental expression of self-determination there is. Wherever that right has been restricted, the restriction followed a pattern: it was taken first from the people least able to fight its taking, and used most against the people left without it. That pattern did not change when the laws did. It adapted.
"The moment you accept that a government may decide who exercises this right, you have already conceded that it is a privilege. That is a concession we do not make."
Colorado has always held both things at once
This state has never fit cleanly into either party's story about it. Coloradans have consistently supported personal liberty and functional governance in the same breath — not as a contradiction, but as a position. The individual's right to determine the course of their own life has never been understood here as belonging to one side of the aisle.
That tradition is under pressure. Over the past several legislative sessions, Colorado has seen a sustained push to regulate firearms in ways that treat the right itself as the problem. Magazine capacity limits, waiting periods, storage mandates, and serial restrictions have moved through the capitol with the momentum of a majority that has decided the right is negotiable. The people most affected by those decisions are the least represented in the rooms where they are made.
What is notably absent from that momentum is evidence. The research on whether these measures reduce violence is contested at best and inconclusive at most. What is not contested is their effect on the people who comply with them. Restrictions without demonstrated outcomes are not policy. They are preference with a legislative stamp.
Why it matters who defines your rights
The legal and political fight over the Second Amendment has been waged almost entirely on the opposition's terms. The question gets framed as public safety versus gun culture, urban versus rural, a modern society versus an outdated amendment. Every one of those frames treats your rights as something to be debated rather than protected.
Renhorne Independence Coalition starts from a different place. The right to bear arms sits inside a broader framework of self-determination — the same framework that protects your speech, your privacy, your association, and your ability to participate in civic life without asking permission. When any one of those rights is treated as negotiable, the others become easier to negotiate. They are not separate issues. They are the same issue.
What we are doing about it
Laws get changed by people who show up consistently, fund the work, and refuse to go away. Gun owners are among the most reliable voters in Colorado and among the least organized advocates for their own rights at the capitol. Renhorne exists to close that gap.
Member dollars go directly toward Colorado policy work: tracking legislation before it moves, building the research that shifts debates, and maintaining the kind of sustained presence at the capitol that occasional outrage cannot buy.
Join Renhorne Independence Coalition
You already show up. Now put your dollars where your rights are.
Membership supports direct policy advocacy in Colorado. You will receive updates on legislation affecting your rights and how your support is being used.
Become a Member